20.6 C
Abu Dhabi
Saturday, January 17, 2026

Trump Questions NATO Commitment, Suggests US May Not Defend Non-Paying Allies

Date:

Washington – Former President Donald Trump has once again cast doubt on the United States’ unwavering commitment to NATO, suggesting that America may not come to the defense of member nations that fail to meet their financial obligations.

Speaking from the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump reiterated his stance that NATO allies must contribute more to their own defense. “I’ve said it before—if they’re not going to pay, we’re not going to defend,” he stated. “I said this seven years ago, and because of that, they ended up paying hundreds of billions of dollars.”

NATO’s core principle, outlined in Article 5 of its charter, dictates that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all. The only time this clause has been invoked was following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States.

When asked whether he would formally make this policy official, Trump defended his position, calling it “common sense.” He also expressed doubt about whether NATO allies would come to America’s defense if roles were reversed. “I know these leaders well, some of them are friends of mine. But if we had a problem, say we called France, do you really think they would rush to defend us? They’re supposed to, but I’m not so sure.”

Despite his criticism, Trump did not call for a US withdrawal from NATO, instead describing the alliance as “potentially good” but “deeply unfair.” His comments echoed similar statements made during his previous campaign, which drew sharp criticism from political opponents.

Meanwhile, Trump’s nominee for US Ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, took a different tone during his confirmation hearing this week, assuring lawmakers that the US remains “ironclad” in its commitment to the alliance.

Trump has long argued that the US shoulders an outsized share of NATO’s financial burden, urging allies to increase their defense spending. His latest remarks reignite concerns over America’s role in the alliance and the future of global security.

Subscribe to our magazine

━ more like this

Cold War Precedents for Greenland Strategic Importance

Greenland's strategic importance during the Cold War provides historical context for understanding current American interest in the Arctic territory, though the evolution from cooperative...

Zelenskyy Heads to Florida as Diplomatic Push for Ukraine Peace Deal Intensifies

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is set to meet with US President Donald Trump in Florida this Sunday, as the diplomatic push for a comprehensive...

Ukraine Peace Initiative Demonstrates Progress Despite Persistent Challenges

Diplomatic negotiations aimed at resolving the protracted Ukraine conflict are demonstrating measurable progress through ongoing discussions in Florida and complementary European engagement. Russian envoys...

Media Coverage Shapes Public Understanding of Complex Issues

Media coverage of the sentence reduction controversy has significantly shaped public understanding of complex legal and political issues surrounding accountability for the coup attempt....

Crimea Annexation Precedent Encouraged Current Invasion

Russia's 2014 Crimea annexation established precedent that insufficient international response to territorial seizures encourages subsequent aggression, with the current full-scale invasion partly resulting from...